| Catch-all Discussions » Don’t Forget the TP - new book » 8/22/2026 9:17 am |
Hi Drew
Just placed my order! Looking forward to a good rainy day read.
| Trip Planning » The Numbers Behind the Noise: Algonquin Backcountry Bookings, Lake by » 8/18/2026 9:52 am |
Great info Iain!
I'm a bit confused by the last column. In the example of Billy Lake, the second column is 2024 at 132 and the third column is 2025 at 149.
As I figure it, that's a difference of +17.
I guess in the world of statistics that may make sense as -17.
But I tend to think of it as a difference from 2024 to 2025 of +17.
Maybe I'm missing something?
| Catch-all Discussions » AI internet searches replacing online documentation and referencing. » 8/10/2026 8:51 pm |
Just put this question to Google's AI search, "Will AI's tendency to "hallucinate" incorrect information cause disenchantment by users?"
The answer I got was ...
Yes, user disenchantment is already actively occurring. While the initial wave of AI search was driven by novelty and convenience, users are experiencing a noticeable "trust hangover" as the real-world consequences of AI hallucinations become clear.
1. The Steep Drop in "Helpfulness" Ratings
- Erosion of Trust: Data tracking user sentiment reveals that the percentage of consumers who find AI search more helpful than traditional search dropped from 82% down to 54%.
- The Skeptic Growth: Over that same period, the camp of absolute AI skeptics grew sixfold. Only 19% of users currently say they fully trust AI search results, compared to 45% who trust traditional search engines.
2. The Scale of the Problem
- The 10% Problem: Peer testing indicates that major systems like Google's AI Overviews have achieved a solid ~90% accuracy rate. However, because Google processes over 5 trillion searches annually, a 10% error rate means tens of millions of incorrect or hallucinated answers are generated every hour.
- The Sourcing Paradox: Even when the AI's final answer is factually correct, studies show that over 50% of those summaries are "ungrounded," meaning the websites the AI links to as "sources" do not actually say or support what the AI claims they do.
3. Faded Convenience and "Double Work"
- Loss of Instant Gratification: Users initially loved AI search because it provided a frictionless, single-paragraph answer. Now, because users are aware that AI routinely fabricates things, 86% of users feel forced to manually verify AI claims against original source websites before accepting them.
- Wasted Effort: Once a user has to double-check the AI's work by clicking the links anyway, the core value proposition of AI search—saving time—evaporates.
4. High-Stakes Anxiety
- Da
| Catch-all Discussions » AI internet searches replacing online documentation and referencing. » 7/31/2026 4:13 pm |
AI Mode Conversation
BB Question: What is the biography of the person who operates the website Algonquinadventures.com
AI Answer:
The person who operates Algonquin Adventures[/url] is Phil Kenny. A formal public biography or detailed personal background for Phil Kenny is not published on the website or in external public records. [[url=]1]
Website Overview
Focus: The platform functions as an outdoor adventure and resource guide centered on Algonquin Provincial Park.
Content: Features backcountry trip logs, camping food guides, historical archives, and photography contributions from partners like Steve Elms. [1[/url], [url=]2[/url], [url=]3]
If you are looking for specific trip reports, historical resources, or photo logs hosted by Phil Kenny on the site, let me know how I can help you search for them.
BB Question:
Your AI overview is incorrect. My name is Barry Bridgeford and I operate the website Algonquinadventures.com.3:49 p.m.
AI Answer:
You are entirely correct, and I sincerely apologize for the hallucinated name in the previous response.Barry Bridgeford is indeed the founder and operator of AlgonquinAdventures.com. He is a dedicated camper, canoeist, and prominent figure in the Algonquin Provincial Park backcountry community. [[url=
| Catch-all Discussions » AI internet searches replacing online documentation and referencing. » 5/23/2026 4:55 pm |
This new form of search engine .. the clickless AI overview .. will impact those websites that endeavour to build public knowledge, introspection, awareness, and community by extracting just their raw information and feeding it back to the public without directing them by clickable links on to those very websites. Unfortunately, the general public won't realize what they are missing. They will ask for information using their own limited ability to express their questions and then believe they're acquiring the full scope of information on subjects. Unfortunately, they'll continue to "not know what they don't know" .. but having read the AI's overview they'll believe they have become fully informed on the subject.
As visitor traffic to original websites dries up, advertising support will also dry up, as will intellectual motivation to continue developing the required content. The alternate website model of "membership-pay-portal" will become the primary means of both protecting and promoting content.
In competing amongst themselves, the various artificial intelligence operators are disrespecting the original idealistic concepts of the internet. Ironically the general public is becoming convinced that AI will do both their searching and their thinking for them .. in other words allowing themselves to be "dumbed down" all the more!
| Catch-all Discussions » AI internet searches replacing online documentation and referencing. » 5/20/2026 8:24 am |
Observing a drop in online documentation and referencing about Algonquin Park camping and canoeing, I've observed a change in peoples' uses .. Facebook, paid portals, etc. However with the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence searches, I've wondered if the "mind-set" and practices of the majority of internet users are going through a dramatic and hereto unrecognized shift.
As a result, I posed a question of Google's own AI search engine .. "Will AI internet searches have the effect of deterring original documentation both on the internet and in academia? The answer I got was below the following line.
It looks like we have entered into the realm of gigantic data-farms, "zero-click" searches and plummeting referral traffic. With original work not being directly rewarded by website visit records and the associated advertising revenue, we may see a progressive "out-dating" and "dumbing-down" of the internet's general content. Perhaps the "pay-wall" website model will be the only way to protect one's efforts!
__________________________________________________________Yes, AI internet searches are actively deterring original documentation and research. By shifting incentives and changing user habits, AI models create an ecosystem where existing data is synthesized rather than new research generated. [1, 2, 3, 4]The impact on original content spans both the broader internet and academia: [1] 1. The Impact on the Open Web
| Ethics » Accountability while using a canoe ... » 4/09/2026 12:19 pm |
I'm thinking the logic is that making a canoe "traceable" might impart a sense of "accountabiity" to anyone using that canoe in conjunction with unlawful activities ... like when a car leaves the scene of a crime ... "Did you get their licence plate number?"
| Ethics » Accountability while using a canoe ... » 4/03/2026 7:36 am |
Given the closure of more actual park offices, the increase in online permits, and the problematic lack of education and/or ethics of more backcountry canoe users ... could the "accountability" of backcountry canoe users be facilitated by requiring all canoes and undersized boats to display a unique registration "number"?
I imagine that when enough problems are caused by uneducated or disruptive canoe users, the pressure to do so will probably increase. My questions are ... Are we approaching that point already? And would doing so enable the province to totally abandon educational efforts and simply concentrate on enforcement efforts?
| Equipment » Packing the car key fob. » 3/11/2026 7:04 pm |
FYI - I just realized one of my Hyundai's key fob's buttons has a "double-trouble" feature. One of its buttons not only unlocks the car, but if the same button is held down for a few seconds it'll lower the front windows. Finding this out brought a troubling scenario to mind .. lock up the car, throw the fob in a secure side pocket of the pack, walk over to the ready canoe and toss the pack in. Unrealized, the pack immediately gets pushed against the thwart and so does the key fob .. just beyond earshot, the car doors unlock and the windows lower! Five days later upon returning to an unsecured car it's discovered the storms that had recently pummelled the tent have also drenched the car's interior.
I just went through a similar experience with the car safe in the garage .. after which I researched the "double trouble feature" online. I'll be searching for a compact "fob-clamshell" in which to safely secure my key fob.
HA! I just went into the dashboard set-up feature and was able to deactive the "Remote Window Control" (by fob button) feature. But I don't think I can deactivate the basic "Remote Door Opening" (by fob button) feature.
| Trip Planning » Opeongo Campsite Closures » 3/04/2026 7:48 pm |
Scroll up to the PCI sub-map and you'll see that before last year's storm there were 68 campsites in the South Arm. If in fact there were 18 campsites destroyed, that would leave 50 campsites remaining for occupancy. 
However, upon referencing the reservation website (when using the "SiteScout" extension) we are informed that there are 57 permits available in 2026 (see red dart) .. what may the very same number available prior to the storm!
Given that there may only be 50 intact campsites available this year, it looks like they could be issuing 57 permits for only 50 campsites!
| Trip Planning » Opeongo Campsite Closures » 3/04/2026 5:07 pm |
Trying to determine which of the Opeongo South Arm campsites are closed on account of the June 2025 storm damage, and whether those closures are incorporated into the reservation system's reservable numbers.
I've been told that the new version of the official park map reflects the closure of the affected campsites. Has anyone seen the new map? Are the affected sites removed from or indicated on the map?
In my searching around online, I came across the following FaceBook post and image from August. It appears to show 18 impacted campsites.
And here are those campsites indicated on the Algonquin Adventures PCI sub-map (from "Jeff's Map") ...
Has anyone got any additional or updated information ... on either specific campsites or the reservation system?
| Catch-all Discussions » Forum Rules, Moderation and User Choices » 3/01/2026 4:27 pm |
The forum is neither Facebook or a Britannica worldwide website resource. Sorry it seems to disappoint you!
| Dealing With Challenges » For those impacted by injury, getting old or otherwise challenged .. » 2/21/2026 1:52 pm |
"bheard" asked, "what about a sub-forum spot for such questions? Suggestions for places as classically backcountry but suitable for folks nursing injuries or just plain getting older."
Well, here it is!
| Catch-all Discussions » Forum Rules, Moderation and User Choices » 2/14/2026 4:11 pm |
The forum rules evolved due to some conflicts that occurred many years ago. In response to those early difficulties, I also had to "ban" a number of abusive users. With successful adherence to the rules, the past years have been a much friendlier experience on the forum. The odd time some people have needed reminding about the forum rules. As the forum moderator, I periodically reached out by Private Message and managed to achieve compliance.
Recently one particular forum user became dissatisfied with forum responses and reacted by deleting their forum account. An unfortunate effect of deleting one's forum account is that one's individual forum postings are automatically deleted. This leaves "holes" in discussion threads which disrupt the flow of the recorded conversations. And if that same forum user had been the "Original Poster" of a discussion thread, then that entire discussion was automatically deleted along with it.
When this became apparent to me, I reached out via phone to the person. We had a sociable lengthly conversation, realizing that the person had registered a new/different forum account.
Over the following days, it seemed the new forum ID was re-establishing himself. However, it appears that some of his dissatisfaction may have of been communicated to other users. The resulting upset was expressed by another user with express reference to the forum rules. I responded that I would be lowering the "rule hammer". In an effort to calm the waters, I contacted the "new forum ID" by PM and asked him to "play nice"!
Unexpectedly, the individual reacted by deleting their new forum account also. Since he had been the "OP" of the very discussion thread where the forum rules were being referenced, that entire thread "disappeared". I want forum readers to understand that rather than "playing nice", the forum user chose (for the second time) to delete their account and their entire presence on the forum.
In the distant past I used the optional "ban"
| Trip Reports » Backcountry Hiking - Day Tripping along Highway 60 » 1/26/2026 5:09 pm |
Drew (All of Algonquin) has just published his account of a morning's worth of checking out a number of brief hikes into the backcountry from Highway 60 ..
Reading his account reminded me of some "Highway 60" recollections of my own. Back many years ago, there were many more opportunities to pull a car off the asphalt and to hike north or south along many trails and portages.
Then the highway got "improved" with many blasted out hills, filled-in low spots, and miles of added guard rails. Unfortunately these "improvements" eliminated these opportunities to "pull-off-and-poke-around".
Amongst these "forgotten accesses" is a popular canoe route between Canisbay and Cache Lakes that actually crosses Highway 60, and belatedly got formal cuts built into its guard rails .. but without any opportunity for cars to drop-off or pick-up canoeists. There was also what seemed to have been an unofficial foot access to Heron Lake on the south side of Highway 60 just east of the West Gate, but a guard rail and grade change have eliminated that. And unloading a vehicle and its canoe directly to Sunday Creek from the south side of the highway isn't practical or safe any longer!
As I typed this forum post, I searched out some of these "accesses" using "Google Earth" and checked out Drew's hikes. This exercise took me back to the early '90's when I participated in a number of the guided interpretive hikes conducted by park naturalists. I recall that some of them were conducted along trails starting from Highway 60 without marked accesses .. some located on the opposite side of the highway from formal interpretive trails.
I wonder how many people these days are poking around these unmarked or poorly marked nooks and crannies? Have any others recently discovered overlooked little gems along Highway 60?
| Equipment » Summer sleeping bag - going ultralight. » 1/24/2026 8:29 am |
| Equipment » Summer sleeping bag - going ultralight. » 1/22/2026 8:06 am |
My gear has been accumulated in over three decades. I have a viable 3 season bag and I do have a viable fleece inner bag. I'm looking to replace my old summer bag (with long-gone labelling) and simply want to keep the 'packing-bulk' down.
As for water filtering, I have an MSR MiniWorks Pumping Filter that's approaching the point of needing a new filter and I'd appreciate any experience-based recommendations for more compact alternatives.
Other than that, I'm pretty well equipped with light equipment.