You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

Trip Planning » McManus LK to Whitson?? » 4/11/2024 9:52 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 16

Go to post

A few (too many, probably) comments here:

Paddling up the narrow sections between those lakes is pretty much a non-starter. 
For the short channel between McManus and Smith, just take the portage.  If the water is low, the takeout can be a bit of a pain due to rocks; at moderate or high water levels, no problem. 
The longer channel from Smith to Whitson - depends on the water level.  At high water, the approach from Smith features fast current and you have to work even to get to the takeout.  The portage itself is a good trail and not difficult.   As MartinG says, the current at the upstream put-in can be pretty lively, but if you're reasonably strong paddlers it shouldn't be a problem.  However, at very high water levels the  put-in can be drowned and you'll have to get wet to get up to where the current is a bit less aggressive.  That said, I don't think the water level this year will be extremely high.  At present it is somewhat high, but that will probably ease up over the next month.

If the water level is low, it can be difficult to get up to the takeout since the water is shallow and it's difficult to get a paddle in deep enough for a good push to fight the fast current. It is possible to line/wade up the channel from Smith to Whitson on the right side at low flow.  There is one deep hole partway up that will mean getting wet, and launching at the top can be tricky, though at least it's shallow.  Wading up on the left side is fine until you get to the top, where current and rocks make it difficult to get back into the canoe.

Both channels are certainly runnable on the way back down.  Whitson to Smith, the current weaves back and forth in the channel, so you need to follow the main flow.  The river bottom there is mostly gravel, but there are nuisance rocks in a few places.  At low flow it's easy to fetch up on a gravel bar, but not a big problem.  Smith to McManus is also fairly easily runnable, especially at higher flow, but at low flow the

Where In Algonquin? » WiA No. 749 » 4/06/2024 11:03 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 21

Go to post

It doesn't jibe with my memories of the campsite on Big Thunder, but I'll throw in that lake just for the heck of it.

Where In Algonquin? » WiA #710 » 12/06/2023 7:28 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 21

Go to post

trippythings wrote:

Bucholtz Lake, near the logging roads?

Looks like a decent campsite,so can't be Bucholtz - the campsite there sucks.

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 687 » 10/04/2023 2:32 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 17

Go to post

Rob, if you have a WIA you'd like to post, please go ahead.  Due to current circumstances, I probably won't be able to  do anything for a while.
 

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 687 » 10/04/2023 6:10 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 17

Go to post

There will be a slight delay, but I'll post something soon.

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 687 » 10/03/2023 5:59 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 17

Go to post

Little Cauchon

Catch-all Discussions » Piece in Explore Magazine (online) » 7/20/2023 8:40 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 8

Go to post

Entertaining article and all (of course) good advice - always better if it comes from someone who's been there, done that, and can speak knowledgeably about the consequences.  It is interesting to see material from your blog edited for a major publication, after having read your original posts.  They've smoothed it out and tightened it up, but your personality still comes through (and that's a good thing).
Well done, and I hope you have more opportunities to appear in Explore or other similar publications.
 

Catch-all Discussions » Call me crazy... » 3/29/2023 3:54 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

(can't delete a message)
 

Catch-all Discussions » Call me crazy... » 3/29/2023 11:37 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

ShawnD wrote:

Nice place to spend a night assuming you aren’t there with a bunch of knuckleheads.

Is your real name Moe?
 

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/25/2023 8:02 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

I'll have to admit, I didn't think to look at the trip report till well after I'd posted, and realized that one of the photos in the trip report was very similar to my WIA selection.  Anyway, good sleuthing on your part.

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/25/2023 6:15 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

Tarn Lake it is.  You're up, Yellowcanoe.

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/24/2023 4:51 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

Not Crotch Lake.  This lake is only accessible by one of two unmaintained portages; this view is from the end of one of them.

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/24/2023 2:45 pm

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

Not on the Petawawa River  ('closer' doesn't necessarily mean close)

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/24/2023 11:38 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

Bottom of Five MIle Rapids is closer than the top

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/24/2023 10:48 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

I'm afraid your vibes are displaced a bit too far south....

Where In Algonquin? » WIA 645 » 3/24/2023 8:10 am

dcmcelroy
Replies: 18

Go to post

Getting closer, but not the top of Five Mile Rapids

Board footera

LNT Canada is a national non-profit organization dedicated to promoting responsible outdoor recreation through education, research and partnerships.