I'm not sure anyone needs to be defended. This is a good discussion, I'm happy to talk and learn.
In terms of my terms... "insane" is an interesting word for sure. It's my preliminary reaction to a government decree that seemed based in dogma and fear, rather than logic and evidence. Perhaps it's a bit dramatic.
There are benefits to any intervention, but there are also harms. Banning all backcountry travel will harm people. People will lose jobs. There may be an increase in anxiety and depression, feeling of isolation. Who knows what will be the long-term effect. At the same time, I don't feel there are any benefits to closing the backcountry in mid-March, and this will do nothing to curb the spread to COVID19.
I am not arguing against a ban in any scenario, I am arguing against a ban right now.
I drove by a playground today - there were 20 kids there, and additional accompanying adults. Monkey bars, all sorts of equipment and close personal contact.
There are more effective and important targets than Big Trout Lake on the last Saturday in April. I agree with personal sacrifices for the greater good. But let's make rational, evidence-based decisions - not ones that are easy and readily available.